This is a summary of the study “Neurofeedback as a Treatment Intervention in ADHD: Current Evidence and Practice” which also emphasizes the topic of metabolic performance (brain brightening).
The study deals with neurofeedback as a treatment approach for ADHD. It describes various protocols, the number of sessions and the associated successes. It mentions that neurofeedback could be interpreted as a form of “brain whitening”, which presumably means improving brain performance through training. Different methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, and the success of the treatment varies depending on the application.
The study describes three standard protocols for neurofeedback for ADHD: theta/beta (TBR), sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) and slow cortical potentials (SCP). TBR requires 30-40 sessions and is as effective as methylphenidate. SMR probably requires a similar number of sessions and helps reduce inattention and hyperactivity. SCP requires about 35 sessions and improves reaction time and memory. Successes include improvements in academic performance, sleep quality and cognitive function.
The study examines neurofeedback-based approaches for the treatment of ADHD. It describes three standard protocols: TBR, SMR and SCP. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages.
30-40 sessions, effective as medication, improves academic performance. Advantages: Lasting effect, no side effects. Disadvantage: High number of sessions.
Same as TBR, with additional improvement in sleep. Advantage: Positive effects on sleep, disadvantage: Further research required.
35 sessions, improves reaction time and memory. Advantage: Improved cognitive functions, disadvantage: High training effort.
Enriquez-Geppert S, Smit D, Pimenta MG, Arns M. Neurofeedback as a Treatment Intervention in ADHD: Current Evidence and Practice. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 May 28;21(6):46. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1021-4. PMID: 31139966; PMCID: PMC6538574.